Package Health

charcoal/contrib-sitemap

This is a generally healthy package to depend on: it is a stable MIT-licensed release, not deprecated or archived, is backed by a matching organization-owned repository, and has clear documentation, security policy, and restrictive workflow permissions. The main concerns are modest maintenance and maturity signals: only four releases over roughly three and a half years, one release in the last 12 months, no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, no tests in either the artifact or repository, and no automated security-scanning tool. These concerns warrant monitoring but do not outweigh the recent release and repository activity, coherent package contents, and organizational backing.

Latest v2.1.0PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

88

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

78

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

100

Health Score Breakdown

Package scaffoldingcaution

The package has a substantial README and uses GitHub Releases, but neither the artifact nor repository contains tests or a changelog. The missing tests are a genuine maintenance and regression-risk gap for a library package, while the documentation provides useful compensating transparency.

Release historycaution

The package is about 1,259 days old with four releases, a median interval of about 224 days, and one release in the last 12 months. The recent release is positive, but the sparse cadence indicates limited ongoing maintenance capacity.

Repo commit activitycaution

There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, which is a concrete recent-maintenance gap. The same-period merged pull request and the release/repository push provide partial compensation, so this is caution rather than danger.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and only two watchers, indicating a small user and contributor footprint. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, so this lowers confidence in broad community resilience but is not independently severe.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. Build support is healthy; the absent scanning automation is a moderate transparency and security-hygiene gap.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Locomotive

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
charcoal/app
Version ^4.0 || ^5.0
—
—
charcoal/core
Version ^4.0 || ^5.0
—
—
charcoal/view
Version ^4.0 || ^5.0
—
—
charcoal/object
Version ^4.0 || ^5.0
—
—
charcoal/factory
Version ^4.0 || ^5.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
1 month ago
Created
3 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform