Package Health

casa-publicadora-brasileira/portal-utils

This release appears suitable for dependency use: it has a stable 2.2.12 version, 46 releases over roughly 3.6 years, seven releases in the last 12 months, a recent repository push, and clear organization ownership with the repository matching the package. The main concerns are the absence of tests and a changelog, limited recent commit activity concentrated entirely in one contributor, and no security scanning or security policy; these reduce confidence in maintenance depth and transparency but do not indicate abandonment or registry unfitness.

Latest 2.2.12PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

70

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

89

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry account has publish access. This is not decisive because the repository is owned by an organization, but it still leaves registry publishing dependent on a narrow account base.

Package scaffoldingcaution

A README is present and the repository uses GitHub Releases, but both the artifact and repository lack tests and a changelog. For a reusable utility library, the missing test coverage is a genuine maintenance and verification gap.

Repo bus factorcaution

One contributor made all 2 commits in the last 3 months, producing a 100% top-contributor share. Organizational ownership partially mitigates handoff risk, but the observed recent activity remains concentrated.

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository recorded 2 commits in the last 3 months, showing recent activity, but the volume is low for a reusable utility library and limits evidence of active maintenance depth.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools are configured. The build setup is healthy, while the missing scanning coverage is a transparency and supply-chain hygiene gap.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
15 days ago
Created
3 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform