The project has clear documentation, tests, release notes, and a steady release history. MIT licensing and a repository that matches the package improve transparency, but the maintainer base remains narrow.
64%
Total Score
67
100
93
50
A post-autoload-dump install-time script is present. This is a modest supply-chain and installation-complexity concern because package installation executes lifecycle behavior.
The repository owner is an individual user rather than an organization, while the recent commit activity is concentrated in that same contributor. There is no organizational handoff capacity shown by this signal.
All 91 commits in the last three months came from one contributor, with a 100% top-contributor share. This creates a real continuity and review risk for a young package.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning layer weakens automated supply-chain oversight.
The repository has no security policy. That reduces transparency around vulnerability reporting and response expectations, particularly for a package with image, AI, and CLI functionality.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^3.0 | — | — |
laravel/ai Version ^0.11.0 | — | — |
laravel/prompts Version ^0.3.22 | — | — |
monolog/monolog Version ^3.10 | — | — |
symfony/console Version ^7.4|^8.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.