The matching repository, tests, MIT license, and organization ownership provide useful transparency. A small dependency set and recent release help, but the absence of commits in the last three months and no security policy leave maintenance concerns.
62%
Total Score
75
100
89
75
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. The recent release partly offsets this, but the lack of current development activity is a maintenance concern.
The repository has no stars or forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counts provide little evidence of a broad user or contributor base.
Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tool was detected. For a small package this is a hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. That weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency, although it does not by itself show that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
bytic/config Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
bytic/container Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
ezyang/htmlpurifier Version ^4.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.