bytic/database
The project has a clear MIT license, tests, and an organization-owned repository. A single registry maintainer, no security policy, and no commits in the last three months limit confidence in ongoing support.
68%
Total Score
83
100
89
75
Health Score Breakdown
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, although two registry releases in the last year and a recent push provide partial compensation.
The repository has no stars or forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, so this lowers external adoption evidence slightly but does not outweigh the release and ownership signals.
Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tool was detected. This is a modest transparency and hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. For a database library this makes vulnerability reporting less transparent, though the maintained source repository and tests partly offset the concern.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Gabriel Solomon |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 bytic/cache Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
bytic/profiler Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
bytic/inflector Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
bytic/collections Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 9 months ago
- Created
- 8 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.