buexplain/netsvr-protocol
Healthy and suitable to use, with a small maintainer and limited project hygiene. It has recent releases and active repository commits, while the lack of tests, changelog, and security policy leaves some transparency gaps.
78%
Total Score
80
100
83
90
Health Score Breakdown
Only one registry account has publish access. This is a limited publishing base, although the matching repository activity shows that the account is currently active.
The package has a substantial README, but neither the artifact nor repository contains tests or a changelog. For a protocol-definition package this is a modest transparency gap rather than a severe adoption risk.
All 8 commits in the last 3 months came from one contributor, leaving maintenance dependent on a single individual.
The repository has 0 stars and 0 forks, with 1 watcher. This provides little external validation, but popularity is supporting evidence rather than a health verdict.
Composer is used as a build tool, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a modest process gap for this small package.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 buexplain |
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 20 days ago
- Created
- 3 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.