A small, organization-backed project has a clear release trail, tests, and release notes. Its recent inactivity, absent security scanning, and unpinned CI actions leave meaningful maintenance and build-integrity gaps.
68%
Total Score
75
100
86
50
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. That recent inactivity is a meaningful maintenance concern, although the release history shows the project has not been abandoned for years.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This leaves a gap in the project's automated security hygiene.
The repository has no security policy. For a small library this is not severe by itself, but it reduces transparency about vulnerability reporting and handling.
Version 0.7.1 is not a prerelease, and no recent releases are prereleases. The pre-1.0 major version still signals some API-change risk, but it is not an abandonment concern.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no untrusted checkout or script-injection findings, but all 8 action references are unpinned. The lack of a top-level permissions block is acceptable on its own and is not the concern here.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
brick/varexporter Version ^0.3.7 || ^0.4.0 || ^0.5.0 || ^0.6.0 || ^0.7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.