The repository is not archived and the package has a clear MIT license, a usage README, and no install-time scripts. Security scanning and a security policy are absent, while the small repository shows little recent activity, limiting confidence in ongoing maintenance.
46%
Total Score
50
100
81
75
The latest release was published about 8 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months and only three releases overall. This is strong evidence that the published dependency may be abandoned.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the measured last 3 months. Combined with the old latest release, this points to weak current maintenance capacity.
Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a maintenance-hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving the process for reporting and handling vulnerabilities unclear. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, but not a severe risk by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^1.22 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^6.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.