The project has tests, a clear MIT license, and organization backing. Its security documentation and scanning are limited, so maintenance depends heavily on the current contributor.
82%
Total Score
83
100
93
83
All 12 recent commits came from one contributor, creating a meaningful continuity risk. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity but does not remove the concentration concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected; this is a modest transparency and assurance gap.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented for a package used in an administrative interface.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
blocs/docs Version * | — | — |
blocs/blocs Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.