Package Health/blesta/thesslstore_module

blesta/thesslstore_module

This is a usable, established package with nearly ten years of release history, a stable non-prerelease version, recent releases, an active non-archived organization-owned repository, a permissive MIT license, and no install-time lifecycle scripts. However, maintenance evidence is thin: only one commit from one contributor in the last three months, with all recent commit activity concentrated in that contributor. The artifact and repository also lack tests and a changelog, the repository has no security policy, and it does not name the package in its README, which creates some uncertainty about repository-to-package alignment. Overall, it appears adoptable with moderate caution, particularly if the integration is business-critical.

Latest 2.0.2

Packagist

65%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Package scaffolding

A README is present and GitHub Releases are used, but neither the artifact nor repository provides tests or a changelog. Those omissions reduce maintenance transparency for an integration module.

Repo bus factor

All commits in the last three months came from one contributor, producing a bus factor concern. The organization-owned repository provides some capacity to hand off maintenance, but no second recent contributor is shown.

Repo commit activity

Only one commit was recorded in the last three months from one active maintainer. Recent repository activity therefore exists but is sparse, creating a maintenance-risk signal.

Repo package mention

The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. While a name mismatch can be normal for a sub-package, the lack of README reference creates caution about how directly the repository documents this package.

Repo popularity

The repository has zero stars and six forks/watchers. Low popularity is only supporting evidence and does not outweigh the organization backing or release history, but it provides little independent evidence of broad community adoption.