Package Health

bitwasp/bitcoinconsensus

The package has tests, a README, and a small dependency footprint. Its declared Unlicense conflicts with the detected MIT license, so clarify licensing before adoption.

Latest v3.0.1PackagistPackagist

42%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

0

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

64

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historydanger

The latest registry release was about seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, despite five historical releases.

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository had no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long release gap and indicating no recent maintenance capacity.

Licensecaution

The artifact declares Unlicense but its LICENSE file is detected as MIT, creating a material licensing ambiguity even though license files exist in both the artifact and repository.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest hygiene gap rather than a standalone adoption blocker.

Repository archivedcaution

The linked repository is not archived, which is a compensating maintenance signal, but its last push was in January 2019 and does not offset the prolonged inactivity.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
7 years ago
Created
9 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform