A solo maintainer and no commits in the last three months limit resilience, while the repository remains active enough to publish recent releases. The README, matching repository, stable version, and lack of deprecation support adoption, but security tooling is absent.
68%
Total Score
50
100
88
50
Only one registry maintainer is listed, leaving limited publishing and maintenance redundancy. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so no compensating organizational capacity is shown.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, which weakens evidence of ongoing development even though a recent release was published.
The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 1 watcher, indicating very limited adoption evidence. Popularity is supporting evidence, so this lowers confidence in maturity but is not decisive alone.
Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tools are present, leaving a modest transparency and supply-chain hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy, so there is no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^3.2 | — | — |
laravel/helpers Version ^1.8 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.8 | — | — |
illuminate/collections Version ^11.6|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
phpfastcache/phpfastcache Version ^9.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.