The organization-backed repository is still active and the package includes a README, changelog, and no install-time scripts. Its single recent contributor and conflicting license records warrant checking ownership and licensing before adoption.
65%
Total Score
83
75
75
The manifest declares MIT, but the artifact license file is detected as GPL-3.0 and the README also describes GPLv3-or-later licensing. The release is licensed, but the mismatch needs resolution before use.
The latest release was over two years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months, which lowers confidence in release maintenance. The long history of 13 releases provides some maturity evidence.
The repository recorded one commit in the last three months, showing some current activity, although the pace is too thin to offset the absence of releases over the last 12 months.
The project uses Composer for builds, which fits the package ecosystem. No security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The repository has no security policy, reducing clarity about how vulnerabilities should be reported and handled. This is a hygiene concern rather than evidence of abandonment.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
composer/installers Version ^1.9 || ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.