Documentation and testing are solid, with clear release notes and a licensed source tree. The project is young and depends heavily on one contributor; missing security guidance, install-time scripts, and unpinned CI actions add modest exposure.
70%
Total Score
75
90
50
The package runs post-autoload-dump, post-install-cmd, and post-update-cmd scripts, which increases install-time execution exposure even though such scripts can be normal for Composer packages.
Seven releases were published within the package's first 49 days, including this release, showing active early iteration. The short history limits evidence of long-term maintenance.
One contributor made about 88% of the recent commits, but a second contributor remains active. This is a genuine continuity concern for a user-owned project, not an abandonment signal by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe code.
The only workflow was fully analyzed with no audit findings or untrusted-code sinks, but all three referenced actions are unpinned. That weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene without making the workflow dangerous on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/boost Version ^2.4 | — | — |
laravel/prompts Version ^0.3 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^13.0 | — | — |
orchestra/testbench Version ^11.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.