Package Health

balerka/laravel-payhub

This is a usable but immature package with good baseline transparency: it is MIT-licensed, has a substantial README, source-repository tests, a coherent file tree, no install-time lifecycle scripts, and is neither deprecated nor archived. However, it is only 122 days old, its nine releases have arrived at a very rapid cadence, and the repository records zero commits and zero active maintainers over the last three months, leaving maintenance continuity unproven despite the recent release. The zero-star, single-user-owned repository, absence of security scanning and a security policy, and lack of workflow automation add moderate confidence and operational concerns. It may be reasonable for evaluation or controlled use, but a payment package should be adopted with close review and a fallback plan.

Latest v1.5.1PackagistPackagist

62%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

83

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

90

Health Score Breakdown

Project backingcaution

The repository is owned by a user rather than an organization, so the available ownership evidence indicates a potentially thin project backing for a young payment package.

Release historycaution

The package is very young at 122 days and has nine releases, with a median interval of about 1 hour; this shows release activity but also an unusually compressed history that provides little evidence of long-term stability.

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository reports zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. That conflicts with the recent registry release and leaves ongoing maintenance capacity unproven, which is material for a payment dependency.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is not required for health, but this provides no external adoption evidence for a young package.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools are configured; the missing scanning is a maintenance and transparency gap for payment-related code.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
illuminate/http
Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0
—
—
guzzlehttp/guzzle
Version ^7.0
—
—
illuminate/routing
Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0
—
—
illuminate/support
Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0
—
—
illuminate/database
Version ^11.0|^12.0|^13.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
24 days ago
Created
4 months ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform