The MIT license, detailed README, and release notes provide good transparency. A small organization-backed project still has limited independent maintenance and workflow hygiene.
72%
Total Score
67
100
75
All 4 recent commits came from one contributor, leaving maintenance dependent on a single active person. Organization backing provides some continuity, but no second active contributor is shown.
The repository recorded 4 commits in the last 3 months, which is some recent activity but a modest maintenance pace for a dependency.
The repository has no security policy, reducing clarity about how users should report vulnerabilities and how security issues are handled.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings, but all 3 action references are unpinned. That is a supply-chain hygiene gap, not a severe risk by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
twbs/bootstrap Version ^5.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.