The README, repository tests, and release notes make the package reasonably understandable. Organization backing and no install-time scripts help, but verify the license before adoption.
58%
Total Score
75
75
75
The artifact includes an Apache-2.0 license file, so the release is licensed, but the manifest declares WTFPL and the detected license differs. That mismatch should be resolved before adoption.
This is the package's only release, published about 3 years and 6 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is meaningful evidence of limited ongoing maintenance.
The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the package's one-release history and increasing abandonment risk.
The project uses Make and Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest maintenance and assurance gap, partly offset by the repository's tests and build structure.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap for a PDF-processing library, although it does not by itself show that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
setasign/fpdi Version ^2 | — | — |
tecnickcom/tcpdf Version ^6.2.22 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.