Usable with caveats: it has an MIT license, tests, organization backing, and six releases, but repository activity has stopped since April 28 and the package has no README or security policy. Adopt it only if the limited maintenance history is acceptable.
58%
Total Score
50
100
72
90
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months, despite the package's recent release history. This is the strongest concern because it leaves current maintenance capacity unproven.
Tests are present in both the package and repository, supporting basic project maturity. The missing README is a real usability gap for a library consumers must integrate, while the missing changelog is normal packaging practice.
Six releases in about 170 days, including the latest release on April 25, show an initially active release process. The short history limits evidence of long-term maintenance.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no activity in the last month. This is not inherently unhealthy for a small package, but it provides little evidence of an active user or maintainer community.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers, so there is no community adoption evidence to offset the limited maintenance record. For a small organization-owned adapter, this is supporting caution rather than a severe risk by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
cycle/database Version ^2.0 | — | — |
app-dev-panel/api Version * | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.