The repository is organization-owned, matches the package, and is not archived. It has a release note and repository changelog, but no security policy and only one registry publisher leave limited transparency.
43%
Total Score
50
67
75
Only one release exists, published nearly six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of a stale dependency and is not offset by the repository's current non-archived status.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Although it was pushed recently, the observed commit activity indicates no demonstrated ongoing maintenance.
The package has no declared license, license file, or repository license file. That creates a material adoption and transparency problem for an open-source dependency.
Only one registry account has publish access, which is a resilience concern. The organization-owned repository provides some compensating backing, so this is not treated as a severe risk by itself.
The repository uses Composer for builds, but no security scanning tooling was detected. This is a hygiene gap that adds some transparency risk alongside the older release.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
jenssegers/date Version ^4.0 | — | — |
arcanedev/log-viewer Version ^7.0 | — | — |
webpatser/laravel-uuid Version ^3.0 | — | — |
barryvdh/laravel-dompdf Version ^0.8.6 | — | — |
mateusjunges/laravel-acl Version ^2.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.