84%
Total Score
healthy
Frequent releases and active organization backing outweigh concentrated commits and permissive CI workflows.
One bot made 21 of 23 recent commits, concentrating activity at about 91%. The organization-owned repository provides some handoff capacity, but the observed contributor concentration remains a maintenance caution.
The repository has only 1 star and 0 forks, so independent adoption evidence is limited; popularity is supporting evidence rather than a decisive health measure.
Composer is used as a build tool, but no security scanning tool was detected, leaving a modest gap in repository hygiene.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and response expectations.
Both workflows use top-level write permissions and all 3 analyzed actions are unpinned, creating CI hygiene and reproducibility concerns. However, the audit found no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-severity findings, so this is not a severe workflow risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
brick/math Version >=0.12.1 | — | — |
brick/date-time Version >=0.7.0 | — | — |
galbar/jsonpath Version >=3.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.15.2 | — | — |
speakeasy/serializer Version ^4.0.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.