Consumer documentation, tests, licensing, and a GitHub release make the package easier to evaluate. Its single-release history and long inactivity leave maintenance uncertain, while the repository does not identify this package in its name or README.
45%
Total Score
25
100
63
83
The package has only one release, published about 16 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This leaves ongoing maintenance and compatibility uncertain.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the one-release history, this is strong evidence of limited ongoing maintenance.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. This raises uncertainty that the linked repository is the actual source for this release.
The repository is owned by a user account rather than an organization, so the single registry maintainer does not have organizational backing to compensate for the thin maintenance record.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a modest transparency and maintenance gap, not a standalone adoption blocker.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.0 | — | — |
monolog/monolog Version ^2.9 | — | — |
vlucas/phpdotenv Version ^5.3 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.