Clear examples and a small dependency surface keep adoption straightforward. The repository includes tests and the release is licensed, with no install-time scripts or deprecation warning. Continued reliance on one contributor remains the main maintenance concern.
79%
Total Score
50
100
94
75
The repository is owned by a user account, not an organization. That is consistent with the concentrated maintainer base and provides no visible organizational redundancy.
One contributor made all two commits in the last three months, giving the project a concentrated maintenance base. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-owned, so no organizational handoff is shown to offset that risk.
The repository recorded two commits in the last three months, so activity has not stopped, but the volume is limited and should be read alongside the single-contributor concentration.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance-hygiene gap, not evidence that the release is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a small helper library this is a documentation gap, but it leaves vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/framework Version ^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.