Ownership is concentrated in one contributor, and the short release history leaves less evidence of long-term stability. The package is well documented and tested, with recent activity and security scanning; tightening workflow pinning would improve its maintenance hygiene.
78%
Total Score
67
100
94
75
The repository is owned by an individual account, consistent with the single-person publishing context; recent activity and a second contributor provide some, but not organizational, maintenance backing.
Only three releases have been published over 241 days, with a median interval of about 97 days. Recent repository activity partly offsets the limited release history, but there is still modest evidence of long-term release maturity.
One contributor made 11 of 12 recent commits, so maintenance depends heavily on a single person. A second active contributor provides limited compensation, but the concentration remains a real continuity concern for this individually owned project.
No repository security policy was found, leaving vulnerability reporting expectations unclear. This is a transparency gap, but it is not evidence that the package is unsafe by itself.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no injection, untrusted-checkout, or high-severity findings. However, both referenced actions are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/cache Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.8.2 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.