The package has a clear README, tests, a stable release, and only one runtime dependency. Its workflow uses read-only permissions, but its two actions are unpinned and no security policy is present.
60%
Total Score
50
100
90
50
One registry maintainer publishes the package, and the repository is owned by an individual rather than an organization. That is workable for a small package but leaves limited visible succession capacity when activity stops.
The latest release was published over three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. Earlier releases arrived regularly, so this indicates possible abandonment rather than an inherently immature project.
The repository has recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. This is the strongest maintenance concern in the available evidence.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and maintenance handling. This is a modest concern rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
The workflow was fully analyzed, uses read-only permissions, and has no untrusted checkouts or script-injection findings. Both action references are unpinned, which is a minor supply-chain hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.