The package includes a README, tests, an MIT declaration, and a matching source repository. Its small release history and no commits in the last three months leave maintenance uncertain; the missing security policy adds a smaller transparency gap.
55%
Total Score
25
100
88
88
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with no releases for about three years, this is concrete evidence of inactive maintenance.
The package and repository are owned by the same individual account rather than an organization. That is consistent ownership, but it provides less visible institutional backing for long-term maintenance.
Only two releases were published, both in July 2023, with no releases in the last 12 months. The package is not deprecated, but its release record gives little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a package that processes application data and depends on a PDF engine, this weakens the documented path for reporting and handling vulnerabilities.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
mpdf/mpdf Version ^8.1.6 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.