Its README, tests, and MIT licensing make integration and reuse clearer. Workflow findings, including a high-confidence template-injection issue and seven unpinned actions, add maintenance and build-hygiene concerns.
58%
Total Score
75
100
92
67
The latest registry release was published nearly two years ago, and there were no releases in the last 12 months. This is meaningful staleness for a library dependency, although the repository was pushed more recently.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. That weakens evidence of ongoing maintenance despite the repository not being archived.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though it is partly offset by the repository's visible tests and build workflow.
All seven analyzed action references are unpinned, and the audit found a high-confidence template-injection issue in the code-style workflow plus an archived action in the release workflow. No untrusted checkout or dangerous trigger was reported, so these are hygiene and supply-chain concerns rather than a standalone disqualifier.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laminas/laminas-xmlrpc Version ^2.16 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.