The small project has tests, a clear license, minimal runtime dependencies, and a recent release. Its lack of commits in the last three months and weak workflow controls leave some maintenance and publishing risk.
64%
Total Score
75
100
94
67
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. That weakens evidence of active maintenance, although the recent release and push provide some compensation.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. This is supporting evidence of a small project, but popularity alone does not outweigh its direct maintenance evidence.
No security policy is present, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear. This is a modest transparency gap for a package intended as a reusable dependency.
All nine action references are unpinned, the workflow grants top-level write permissions, and two high-confidence archived-action findings were reported. There are no untrusted checkouts or script-injection findings, but the publishing workflow still has avoidable supply-chain hygiene weaknesses.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.