The project has a clear MIT license, documented releases, repository tests, and recent publication activity. Maintenance is uncertain because there were no commits in three months, while workflow permissions and the high-confidence bot-condition finding add avoidable release-process risk.
62%
Total Score
63
100
100
67
The package runs a post-autoload-dump install-time script. This is worth awareness during installation, but the signal does not by itself show unsafe behavior or poor maintenance.
Only one registry account has publish access. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so this represents a thin publishing base and limited continuity if that maintainer becomes unavailable.
The package and repository are both owned by the same individual account, which supports provenance but offers no organizational backing to offset the single-maintainer risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. That is a meaningful maintenance concern for a package released only recently.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency gap for a package that analyzes application routes and integrates with an MCP server, though it is not by itself a release blocker.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/mcp Version ^0.5.1 | — | — |
nikic/php-parser Version ^5.7 | — | — |
illuminate/contracts Version ^11.0||^12.0 | — | — |
spatie/laravel-package-tools Version ^1.16 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.