369work/misleading-checker
Clear documentation, a license, tests, and a simple dependency set reduce adoption friction. Its maintenance record is too thin after a single release, with no commits or active maintainers in the last three months and no security policy.
58%
Total Score
50
100
83
75
Health Score Breakdown
This is a 163-day-old package with only one release, so there is little release history from which to judge sustained maintenance.
The repository had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Because the project has only one release, this is meaningful evidence of limited demonstrated maintenance capacity.
The repository has two stars and no forks or watchers. This is weak supporting evidence of adoption, but popularity is not decisive for a small package.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest repository hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about how maintainers would receive and handle vulnerability reports.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
No maintainer information available.
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 5 months ago
- Created
- 5 months ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.