Tree-sitter bindings for the web
73%
Total Score
caution
All 51 workflow actions are unpinned, with a high-confidence app-permission issue and no README mention of this package.
Eight accounts can publish, but five use consumer email addresses and one uses dcreager.net; alongside the organization-backed repository, this is an account-hygiene caution rather than evidence of weak maintenance capacity.
The repository name does not match web-tree-sitter and its README does not mention the package, so the linkage is less transparent; the mismatch may reflect a monorepo sub-package, but the absent README mention remains a caution.
No repository security policy was found, leaving disclosure and handling expectations less transparent.
Version 0.27.1 is not a stable major release, but it is not prerelease and recent releases contain no prerelease share, so this is a modest maturity limitation rather than a major concern.
All 51 analyzed action references are unpinned, and a high-confidence finding reports blanket GitHub App installation permissions in backport.yml. The cache-poisoning findings are low confidence and remain hygiene concerns; pull_request_target triggers had no reported untrusted checkout or script-injection sink.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.