Make videos programmatically
88%
Total Score
healthy
Frequent releases and exceptional repository activity outweigh a high-confidence workflow template-injection finding.
No build attestation or trusted-publisher provenance is present, leaving publication origin less verifiable. This is a transparency gap, but other maintenance evidence is strong.
The project uses TypeScript, Turbo, npm scripts, and Vite for its build. No security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest security-process gap.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency around vulnerability reporting and response.
All six workflows were analyzed, but one high-confidence template-injection finding in changelog.yml is a material workflow risk. Cache poisoning was also reported with low confidence, and 61 of 50 analyzed action references were unpinned, weakening reproducibility.
| Title | Versions | Severity |
|---|---|---|
CVE-2026-30121 remotion is vulnerable to Write-what-where Condition in versions 0.0.0 - 4.0.410. | 0.0.0 - 4.0.410 | Critical |
CVE-2026-30120 remotion is vulnerable to Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in versions 0.0.0 - 4.0.410. | 0.0.0 - 4.0.410 | Critical |
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.