82%
Total Score
healthy
Steady releases and active repository work outweigh missing provenance, unpinned actions, and uncertainty about the package-repository match.
The package has no build attestation or trusted-publisher provenance. Active releases and repository activity provide some context, but they do not replace verifiable publication provenance.
The repository name does not match motion-utils and its README does not mention the package, so the package-to-repository relationship is not independently clear. The monorepo context makes this plausible, but the mismatch remains a transparency caution.
The repository uses established build tools including TypeScript, Rollup, esbuild, and npm scripts, but reports no security-scanning tools. The missing scanning is a modest transparency gap.
The repository has no security policy. This does not show unsafe code, but it leaves vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
The only workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings, and it scopes permissions at job level. Both action references are unpinned, which is a supply-chain hygiene caution without an exposed untrusted path.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.