mjml-image
88%
Total Score
100
100
90
75
50
No build attestation, trusted publisher identity, or staged publishing is reported, leaving release provenance less transparent than it could be.
The repository name does not match mjml-image and its README does not mention the package, which creates a package-to-source transparency concern. The repository file tree clearly shows a large component monorepo containing many mjml packages, partially explaining the mismatch but not the absent README mention.
The repository uses Babel and npm scripts for builds, but reports no security scanning tools. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap, not evidence of abandonment.
No repository security policy was found, which reduces transparency around vulnerability reporting and response expectations.
None of the three workflows declares top-level token permissions, and none is reported as read-only. This weakens CI permission hygiene even though no top-level write permissions were detected.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
lodash Version ^4.17.21 | — | — |
mjml-core Version 5.4.1 | — | — |
@babel/runtime Version ^7.28.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.