mjml-head-style
88%
Total Score
100
100
90
80
50
No registry build attestation or trusted publisher provenance is available, which reduces publication transparency and warrants a modest caution.
The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention mjml-head-style, which creates uncertainty about package-to-repository traceability. The mismatch is consistent with a monorepo, but the absence of a README mention still warrants caution.
The repository uses Babel and npm build tooling, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing security automation is a hardening gap and merits caution.
No SECURITY.md or equivalent security policy was detected, leaving vulnerability-reporting procedures unclear and creating a transparency gap.
All three workflows lack top-level token permissions declarations, although none declares top-level write permissions and one uses job-level permissions. This is a workflow-hardening gap rather than evidence of unsafe behavior.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
lodash Version ^4.17.21 | — | — |
mjml-core Version 5.4.1 | — | — |
@babel/runtime Version ^7.28.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.