mjml-carousel
86%
Total Score
100
100
90
80
50
No build provenance attestation or trusted publisher identity is provided, leaving publication integrity less transparent even though this is not by itself evidence of an unhealthy project.
The repository name does not match mjml-carousel and its README does not mention the package, creating a provenance and ownership-transparency concern. The repository's substantial monorepo structure and package-oriented tree partially explain the name mismatch but do not establish an explicit README mention.
The repository uses Babel and npm build tooling, but no security scanning tools were detected; the build setup is present while security-tooling coverage remains a hygiene gap.
No repository security policy was found, which reduces transparency around vulnerability reporting and response procedures.
All three workflows lack top-level permissions declarations, although none declares top-level write permissions and one uses job-level permissions. Explicit least-privilege defaults would improve workflow hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
lodash Version ^4.17.21 | — | — |
mjml-core Version 5.4.1 | — | — |
@babel/runtime Version ^7.28.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.