Parameterised tests for Jest
79%
Total Score
100
100
89
88
The repository name does not match jest-each and its README does not mention the package, so the package-to-repository association is indirect and warrants caution. The monorepo context makes a name mismatch ordinary, but the absent README mention leaves the linkage less transparent.
The project uses established build tools including TypeScript, Babel, webpack, Vite, and npm scripts, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The tooling supports maintainability, while the missing scanner is a modest transparency gap.
All 11 workflows were analyzed successfully, all 48 action references are pinned, and no untrusted checkout or script-injection sink was found. The high-confidence use-trusted-publishing finding indicates registry publishing relies on a long-lived token, which is a supply-chain hygiene concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
chalk Version ^4.1.2 | — | — |
jest-util Version 30.5.1 | — | — |
@jest/types Version 30.5.1 | — | — |
pretty-format Version 30.5.1 | — | — |
@jest/get-type Version 30.5.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.