Is this an arguments object? It's a harder question than you think.
68%
Total Score
63
100
95
88
50
No build attestation or trusted-publisher provenance is present, leaving publication origin less verifiable. This is a transparency gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
A single registry publisher is a thin publishing base, but the linked repository is owned by an organization, which provides some compensating project backing.
The package has existed since January 2014 with nine releases, but its latest registry release was about 21 months ago and there were no releases in the last 12 months. This lowers confidence in current maintenance.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Although the repository was pushed about six months ago, the recent activity is limited and increases abandonment concern.
Only one issue is open, with no new or closed issues or pull requests in the last month. The low workload is not itself a concern, but it provides little evidence of active maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
call-bound Version ^1.0.2 | — | — |
has-tostringtag Version ^1.0.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.