Monkey patches for file system related things.
68%
Total Score
50
100
88
90
50
No build attestation, trusted publisher, or staged publishing is recorded. This is a transparency and reproducibility gap, although it is not by itself evidence that the release is unsafe.
Only one account has registry publish access. That can be sufficient for a small package, but it creates a thin publishing base and increases continuity risk if that maintainer becomes unavailable.
The repository is owned by an individual account rather than an organization. This matches the single-maintainer picture and leaves less visible institutional backing for long-term continuity.
The project has existed for over 9 years with 20 releases and a roughly 40-day median release interval, but it has made no release in the last 12 months. The long history compensates for some of the recent slowdown, but the current release cadence lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with no release in the last year, this is the clearest sign of possible maintenance slowdown.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.