Given a Mocha / Cypress spec file, returns the list of suite and test names
78%
Total Score
75
100
94
63
50
No build attestation or trusted-publisher identity is present, reducing publication transparency, though this is a moderate gap rather than evidence of unsafe behavior.
A prepare script runs during installation, which adds build or execution behavior to dependency installation and deserves modest caution.
Only one registry account has publish access, which concentrates release authority. The repository's recent activity from two contributors provides some compensation.
There were no new or closed issues or pull requests in the last month, despite five open issues and three open pull requests. Recent commits provide some evidence against abandonment but do not show active issue handling.
The project uses Babel, but no security-scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap rather than a direct dependency-health failure.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
debug Version ^4.3.3 | — | — |
acorn-walk Version ^8.2.0 | — | — |
tinyglobby Version ^0.2.13 | — | — |
@babel/parser Version ^7.27.2 | — | — |
simple-bin-help Version ^1.8.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.