Provides a list of electron-to-chromium version mappings
80%
Total Score
healthy
Frequent releases and recent commits are reassuring, but maintenance is concentrated in one contributor and workflow hygiene is uneven.
Only one registry account has publish access, which leaves publishing dependent on a single person; repository activity confirms that person is currently active but does not remove the concentration risk.
The repository is owned by an individual rather than an organization, so the concentrated contributor and publisher base has no visible organizational handoff to offset it.
One contributor made all 124 commits in the last 3 months, creating a meaningful continuity risk despite the high activity level and recent releases.
No security policy is present, reducing transparency about how vulnerabilities should be reported and handled.
Both workflows were analyzed successfully, but all 5 action references are unpinned, the publish workflow installs a package outside a lockfile, and one workflow has top-level write permissions. The low-confidence cache-poisoning finding is hygiene only, but the high-confidence adhoc-packages finding warrants caution.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.