a CSS selector parser
78%
Total Score
67
100
100
67
100
The repository is maintained by an individual rather than an organization, so the single-maintainer concentration is a genuine continuity concern rather than an organizational handoff pattern.
All five recent commits came from one contributor, so maintenance depends heavily on a single person. The long project history and recent release activity reduce but do not remove that continuity risk.
No repository security policy is present. This is a transparency and vulnerability-reporting gap, although CodeQL and Dependabot provide some compensating security practice.
All workflows were analyzed, but eight of ten action references are unpinned and a high-confidence bot-conditions finding affects the Dependabot automerge workflow. The cache-poisoning finding is low confidence and is only a hygiene concern.
| Title | Versions | Severity |
|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-21222 css-what is vulnerable to Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in versions 0.0.0 - 2.1.3. | 0.0.0 - 2.1.3 | High |
CVE-2021-33587 css-what is vulnerable to Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in versions 4.0.0 - 5.0.0. | 4.0.0 - 5.0.0 | High |
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.