Helper function for exhaustive checks of discriminated unions in TypeScript
64%
Total Score
50
100
93
50
50
No build attestation or trusted-publisher identity is recorded, reducing publication transparency. This is a provenance gap, but it does not by itself indicate that the package is unsafe to depend on.
A prepublish lifecycle script is present, adding a small amount of publish-time build complexity. No compensating build-provenance signal is present, so this is a minor hygiene concern rather than a severe risk.
The package has existed since 2017, but its six releases are widely spaced and there have been no releases in the last 12 months; the latest was about 21 months ago. This suggests slowing maintenance, though a small stable utility may need few releases.
The repository had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with roughly 21 months since the last push. That materially raises the chance that future fixes will be slow.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented reporting path. For a small utility this is a transparency gap, but it is not evidence of abandonment on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.