Hide targets from screen readers
88%
Total Score
healthy
Active releases, strong project backing, and good package documentation outweigh unpinned workflow actions and a missing security policy.
No build attestation or trusted-publisher identity is present. This is a transparency weakness for release verification, but the active repository and release history provide compensating project evidence.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. Because this is a subpackage in a broader repository, the mismatch is explainable, but the missing README mention leaves package ownership less explicit.
The repository uses established TypeScript, Vite, tsup, SWC, npm, and esbuild tooling. No security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest security-process gap.
The repository has no security policy. That reduces disclosure transparency, but it does not indicate abandonment and is outweighed by the repository's active maintenance evidence.
All three workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings. However, 8 of 9 action references are unpinned and one workflow grants top-level write permissions, creating a workflow reproducibility and least-privilege weakness.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
@zag-js/dom-query Version 1.46.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.