@vercel/backends
82%
Total Score
healthy
Strong maintenance and release activity outweigh a repository-package mismatch and workflow publishing hygiene concerns.
Health Score Breakdown
No build attestation was reported, leaving publication provenance less verifiable than it could be despite the package's strong release and repository activity.
The published artifact has no README, but this is a compiled distribution and the source repository has tests, a changelog, and GitHub release tooling. The missing package README remains a minor consumer-documentation gap.
The linked repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention @vercel/backends, so the package-to-repository relationship is not transparent even though the repository is organization-owned.
The audit found high-confidence template-injection findings and 75 unpinned action references, but no untrusted checkouts or script-injection counts; it also found trusted publishing and many ad hoc package installs. The trusted-publishing finding is a caution, while the remaining workflow issues are mainly hygiene concerns.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 tsx Version 4.21.0 | — | — |
zod Version 3.22.4 | — | — |
srvx Version 0.11.16 | — | — |
execa Version 3.2.0 | — | — |
fs-extra Version 11.1.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 1 hour ago
- Created
- 11 months ago
- Unpacked Size
- 0.2 MB
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.