mention extension for tiptap
88%
Total Score
healthy
Frequent releases and active contributors support a healthy release, with workflow pinning as the main hygiene gap.
Four of six publishing accounts use the organization domain, but _bdbch (bdbch.com) and svenadlung (ueber.io) are outside-domain publisher accounts, creating a minor account-hygiene concern.
The repository name does not match @tiptap/extension-mention and its README does not mention the package. This is more concerning than a simple monorepo name mismatch because the package-to-repository relationship is not explicit.
All three workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkout or script-injection findings, but all 19 action references are unpinned. A high-confidence template-injection finding and an ad hoc package install in the publish workflow add workflow hygiene risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.