The repository is actively maintained, with 223 commits and 21 active contributors in three months, backed by regular releases. Two outside-domain publishing accounts and unpinned workflow actions warrant modest caution, while the package has types, licensing, provenance, tests, and security policy.
88%
Total Score
90
100
94
83
100
Four of six publishing accounts use the organization’s tiptap.dev domain, but _bdbch (bdbch.com) and svenadlung (ueber.io) are outside-domain accounts. Organization backing makes this an account-hygiene concern rather than evidence of limited maintenance capacity.
The repository name differs from the package name, which is normal for a monorepo, but its README does not mention this package. That leaves some uncertainty about the package-to-repository linkage.
All three workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkout or script-injection trigger findings, but all 19 action references are unpinned and the publish workflow installs a package outside a lockfile. The high-confidence template-injection finding is a hygiene concern here because no dangerous trigger was reported.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.