image extension for tiptap
82%
Total Score
healthy
Frequent releases and active organization-backed development outweigh workflow pinning and package-repository identification gaps.
Four of six publishing accounts use the organization domain, consistent with organization-backed publishing. The outside-domain accounts _bdbch (bdbch.com) and svenadlung (ueber.io) are an account-hygiene caution, though they do not by themselves indicate weak maintenance capacity.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention @tiptap/extension-image. This is plausible for a monorepo, but the absence of either reference leaves package-to-repository identification less explicit.
All three workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkouts, script-injection findings, or broad top-level write permissions. However, all 19 action references are unpinned, and the publish workflow has high-confidence template-injection and high-confidence ad hoc package-install findings; these are workflow hygiene concerns rather than evidence of a compromised release.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.