collaboration extension for tiptap
88%
Total Score
healthy
Active maintenance, organization backing, and verified publishing outweigh workflow pinning and package-link hygiene gaps.
Four of six publishing accounts use the primary tiptap.dev domain, but _bdbch (bdbch.com) and svenadlung (ueber.io) are outside-domain publishing accounts, creating a modest account-hygiene concern; organization backing partly offsets it.
The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention @tiptap/extension-collaboration. A monorepo explains the name mismatch, but the missing README mention leaves the package-to-source relationship less explicit.
All three workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkout or script-injection findings, but all 19 action references are unpinned and the audit found a high-confidence template-injection pattern plus an ad hoc package install in publish.yml.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.