Storybook Manager API (facade)
68%
Total Score
100
100
94
80
50
No build attestation or trusted-publisher identity is present, leaving publication provenance less transparent than it could be. This is a transparency gap, not evidence that the release is unsafe.
Three workflows use pull_request_target and one uses workflow_run, which creates workflow-level review risk. However, no analyzed workflow performs an untrusted checkout or detected script injection, limiting the concern.
The package includes a README, but it explicitly directs consumers to @storybook/manager-api and says this package will no longer be released in Storybook 8. Repository tests, a changelog, and GitHub releases show the broader project is maintained, but this package's transition creates real adoption risk.
Eleven workflows declare read-only permissions, but four omit top-level permissions and four declare top-level write access. This mixed configuration is a workflow-hardening gap despite the stronger read-only majority.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
@storybook/manager-api Version 7.6.17 | — | — |
@storybook/client-logger Version 7.6.17 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.