This project exposes the available formatters from the CLI for users that perform custom validation through Javascript.
82%
Total Score
healthy
Healthy; active organization-backed maintenance outweighs workflow hygiene and security-transparency gaps.
No build attestation or trusted-publisher identity is recorded, leaving release origin less independently verifiable even though other maintenance signals are strong.
The repository name does not match the package and its README does not mention it, which warrants caution about package-to-source linkage; the organization-backed monorepo context partly explains the mismatch.
The repository uses TypeScript, npm scripts, and SWC, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a security-process gap.
The linked repository has no security policy, reducing clarity about how users should report vulnerabilities and how maintainers handle them.
All six workflows were analyzed with no untrusted checkout or script-injection findings, but 18 of 20 action references are unpinned; a high-confidence secrets-inherit finding and an adhoc package installation add workflow hygiene concerns.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
chalk Version 4.1.2 | — | — |
cliui Version 7.0.4 | — | — |
tslib Version ^2.8.1 | — | — |
lodash Version ^4.18.1 | — | — |
strip-ansi Version 6.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.